WASHINGTON – President Bush on Wednesday signed
the Child Abduction Prevention Act, a broad piece of
crime legislation that enhances the Justice Department’s
ability to pursue and prosecute sex offenders and
pornographers who prey on children.
Legislators, law enforcement officers, and victims
and the families of victims of abuse, including
Elizabeth Smart and her parents, looked on at the
signing ceremony Wednesday afternoon in the White House
Rose Garden. Connecticut Gov. John Rowland also attended
because of the state was one of the first to adopt the
AMBER alert system to help find missing children.
The bill was hailed as the most comprehensive piece
of legislation passed in the effort to protect children
from sexual predators. However, some of its provisions
are raising questions among free speech and civil
liberties activists.
It includes a provision sponsored by Connecticut Rep.
Nancy L. Johnson to give federal agents broader power to
tap the phones of suspected child predators.
The act is a compilation of several pieces of
legislation. It includes provisions to crack down on
child pornography, to enhance and coordinate the AMBER
Alert systems developed in many states to publicize
searches for missing children, to give federal agents
broader authority to investigate child abuse and
abductions, to enhance the war on drugs and to toughen
penalties for convicted sex offenders.
The provision against child pornography is a somewhat
retooled version of the Child Pornography Prevention Act
of 1996, a statute that was struck down by the Supreme
Court last year because it violated the First Amendment.
The 1996 law made it illegal to make, possess,
advertise, or distribute images that “appear to be” of
children engaged in sexually explicit conduct – a
provision that, it was argued could be applied to works
with legitimate social, artistic or scientific value;
examples often given include the feature films Lolita
and Romeo and Juliet.
The Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional
relying on a previous ruling in a 1982 case that said
laws banning pornographic images of actual children are
only constitutional because the making of the images
themselves constituted child abuse.
The Supreme Court also criticized the 1996 law,
saying it came dangerously close to placing the burden
of proof on the defendant, which is prohibited by the
Constitution.
Bill Lyon, executive director of the Free Speech
Coalition, the group that brought the successful case
against the 1996 child pornography protection act, said
that the new law is nearly unchanged from the 1996
version. The pertinent difference substitutes the phrase
“virtually indistinguishable from” for “appears to be”
regarding images of children engaged in sexually
explicit conduct.
“It still appears that people who are accused. . .
are presumed guilty until proven innocent,” he said.
According to Marv Johnson of the American Civil
Liberties Union, federal prosecutions of child
pornographers have been highly successful even without
the law on the books because trying to say that an image
is “only virtual child pornography” is not believable in
court.
Of course, to prosecute pornographers and sexual
predators, the government has to catch them first. Also
included in the law were provisions created by
Connecticut Rep. Nancy L. Johnson to give federal agents
broader power to tap the phones of suspected child
predators.
Johnson has been fighting for this bill for nearly
four years, ever since she learned about the growing
practice among child molesters of using Internet sites
and chat rooms to start relationships with their
victims. The wiretapping authority is vital, she said
after Wednesday’s bill signing, because while contact
between abuser and victim frequently begins on the
Internet, the final steps, like arranging meetings, are
often conducted by phone.
The use of wiretaps may allow more abusers to be
prosecuted without requiring abused children to take the
stand in open court, said a spokesman for Johnson’s
office.
Bush congratulated Gov. Rowland for his work on the
AMBER alert program. Connecticut was one of the first
states to adopt the AMBER alert program after it was
pioneered in Texas, Rowland said. Forty-one states
currently have AMBER alert programs.
Wayne Mulligan, general manager of Buckley Radio,
which owns WWCO in Waterbury, has worked on the
Connecticut program and also was in Washington for the
bill signing. He said the state’s AMBER alert system
represents a unusual co-operation of private- and
public-sector efforts to find abducted children. In
addition to sending word out over radio, highway signs
and the Internet,
Connecticut state police can send
AMBER alerts to the phone company SBC, which can then
send word to its network of trucks and repair crews,
adding hundreds more eyes to the search.
The Child Abduction Prevention Act also includes
language taken from the RAVE act sponsored by Sen.
Joseph Biden, D-Del., which would extend federal
crack-house statues to allow prosecution of promoters
who run outdoor or short term-events like dances or
concerts at which drugs are found.
The bill says that promoters can only be prosecuted
if they sponsor such an event “knowingly” and “for the
purpose of” enabling drug sales, but opponents of the
measure fear it could be broadly interpreted to punish
the sponsors of inherently innocuous events at which
patrons take or deal drugs.
Among its other provisions, the bill eliminates
statutes of limitations on a variety of crimes against
children, toughens and strengthens sentencing
requirements for kidnappers and child molesters,
prohibits some attempts to deceive internet users into
viewing pornography unawares, and strengthens
supervision programs for released sex offenders.