WASHINGTON – A Congressional panel Monday
castigated Connecticut and federal health officials and
the U.S. Postal Service for concealing the results of
tests taken during the 2001 anthrax attacks that showed
substantial contamination of mail sorting machines at a
Wallingford, Conn., distribution center.
Dr. James Hadler, director of infectious diseases at
the Connecticut Department of Public Health top, told
lawmakers that he had seen no need to inform workers of
contamination because the department had determined the
threat posed by anthrax was minimal. He said evidence
indicated that the anthrax spores had been present for a
month, during which time no postal employee had gotten
sick.
Under intense questioning that followed his official
statement, Hadler acknowledged that regardless of the
threat level, the public and the postal employees did
have a right to know about the test results but he
blamed the Postal Service for not releasing the
information.
But members of the Government Reform Subcommittee on
National Security, Emerging Threats and International
Relations were unmoved, telling Hadler that the ultimate
responsibility lay with him and his department.
“The public had a right to know exactly what you
found,” Rep. Christopher Shays, the subcommittee
chairman, said.
Other experts who testified said Connecticut
officials were unwise in allowing the postal facility to
continue operating. “The conservative thing would have
been to close the facility,” said Dr. Robert G.
Hamilton, a professor of pathology at Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine.
Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, who attended the hearing,
called the handling of the test results “a shell game,”
expressing outrage that no one ever informed her of the
level of contamination during the many conversations she
had with department officials in 2001.
While the testimony from civilian and military
experts at Monday’s hearing revealed substantial
uncertainty about what is considered “a lethal dose” of
anthrax, there was widespread agreement that the amount
found in one Wallingford machine – about 3 million
spores, according to Hadler’s testimony – was large.
The information released after the testing in 2001,
however, said only “trace amounts” of anthrax had been
found.
The Centers for Disease Control discovered anthrax at
the Wallingford facility after the death of 94-year-old
Connecticut resident Otillie Lundgren in November of
2001. Initial tests ordered by the Postal Service had
not detected any anthrax.
Hadler insisted that sufficient safety measures had
been taken. Postal workers were told to take
antibiotics, the cleaning of machines with compressed
air – which could make anthrax spores airborne and
dangerous – was suspended, and the contaminated machines
were roped off.
But committee members said those measures were not
enough, since anthrax spores can remain viable for
years, and since some postal workers, having been told
the threat was minor, chose not to take antibiotics.
“The [Postal Service] and their government failed
miserably,” American Postal Workers Union President
William Burrus told the subcommittee, saying that
Wallingford employees had been denied the right to make
informed choices about their health and safety.
The day’s testimony indicated that a large number of
state and federal agencies were involved in responding
to the anthrax attacks but communication between them
was poor.
Committee members suggested that response to
potential future health threats be organized under the
Department of Homeland Security, which did not exist at
the time of the anthrax attacks.